← Back to Research Synthesis Lab

Centering Community Needs in Energy Equity

Research on energy burdens, clean energy access, and community-based solutions

16.8% Energy Burden (Low-Income)
3.5% Energy Burden (General Pop.)
10-91% Burden Reduction Range
39 Studies Analyzed

Research Question

Which types of groups face historic disinvestment, high energy burdens, and limited access to the clean economy? How can social programs serving Black, rural, and low-income households partner with trusted community-based organizations (CBOs) to ensure solutions align with real needs, strengthen local economies, and retain benefits within communities?

Key Findings

Black, Indigenous, rural, and low‐income households—including renters in older housing stock—experience historic disinvestment, elevated energy burdens, and constrained access to clean energy. Papers report energy burdens as high as 16.8% of income for low-income households (versus 3.5% for the general population).

Programs that combine renewable energy, weatherization, and bill assistance report energy burden reductions ranging from 10% to 91%. Successful initiatives frequently center on trusted community-based organizations (CBOs) that lead outreach and engagement efforts.

Most Affected Populations

  • Black and African-American households
  • Female-headed households
  • Renters (especially in older housing)
  • Indigenous and Native Hawaiian communities
  • Rural populations
  • Low-income families

Effective Strategies

1. Community-Based Outreach

Door-to-door and peer-to-peer methods build trust and increase participation

  • Personal contact addresses information barriers
  • Community members as educators leverage social networks
  • Trusted messengers (faith-based, local leaders)

2. Flexible Funding and Policy

Block grants, on-bill tariffs, and alternative credit scoring

  • CDBG and HOME grants for integrated upgrades
  • On-bill financing removes upfront cost barriers
  • Landlord incentives address split incentive problem

3. Integrated Health-Energy Approaches

Holistic interventions address both structural housing and energy use

  • Address asthma triggers and energy efficiency together
  • Combine home repairs with upgrades
  • Support aging in place

Links

Download Executive Summary (MD)

Study Explorer

Best Practices for Community-Centered Implementation

Community-Based Outreach

Strategies:

  • Door-to-door canvassing
  • Peer-to-peer education
  • Trusted messengers
  • CBO-led engagement

Outcomes: Increased participation, trust, and satisfaction

Sustainability: Builds local capacity, fosters long-term relationships

Flexible Funding & Policy

Strategies:

  • Block grants (CDBG, HOME)
  • On-bill tariffs
  • Landlord incentives
  • Alternative credit scoring

Outcomes: Greater inclusion of LMI, renters, marginalized groups

Sustainability: Adaptable to local needs, supports scaling

Integrated Health & Energy

Strategies:

  • Holistic housing assessments
  • Combined health/energy upgrades
  • Address asthma triggers

Outcomes: Improved health, reduced hospitalizations, increased stability

Sustainability: Addresses root causes, supports aging in place

Capacity Building & Workforce

Strategies:

  • Training programs
  • Job creation
  • Technical assistance
  • Toolkit dissemination

Outcomes: Local job growth, increased technical skills, empowered CBOs

Sustainability: Retains benefits locally, supports economic development

Data-Driven & Participatory

Strategies:

  • Use local data
  • Participatory research
  • Iterative feedback
  • Co-design with community

Outcomes: Programs better aligned with community needs

Sustainability: Informs policy, supports continuous improvement

Social Diffusion & Networks

Strategies:

  • Leverage social networks
  • Co-develop culturally relevant strategies
  • Use community champions

Outcomes: Accelerated program uptake, increased awareness

Sustainability: Builds social capital, supports resilience

Barriers to Program Access

Financial Barriers

  • Upfront costs for upgrades and assessments
  • Lack of credit or poor credit scores
  • Inability to capture incentives (rebates, tax credits)
  • Split incentives in rental housing

Structural and Policy Barriers

  • Regulatory constraints and permitting requirements
  • Limited eligibility criteria
  • Lack of targeted outreach to underserved communities
  • Complex application processes

Technical Barriers

  • Old housing stock requiring extensive repairs
  • Lack of modern infrastructure
  • Need for pre-upgrade work (lead, asbestos, structural)
  • Technical complexity of measures

Trust and Communication Barriers

  • Distrust of government and institutions
  • Language barriers and lack of multilingual materials
  • Lack of awareness about available programs
  • Poor communication from implementers

Systemic Inequities

  • Historic disinvestment in communities of color
  • Redlining and discriminatory practices
  • Exclusion from programs historically
  • Environmental injustice and pollution burden
  • Structural racism in housing and energy systems

Data Visualizations

Energy Burden Comparison

Program Types Distribution

Target Populations

Geographic Distribution